Windows 8 vs mac laptop
If you're a gamer and you want to get your bling on, nothing beats PC gaming. If you could reach back in time 35 years ago and gently pluck an original Macintosh user from and put her in front of a brand new Mac, she would be able to operate today's machine. The file system would look the same. The menu bar would look the same. Even the trash would look the same. Sure, instead of just a few thousand black and white pixels, the screens would be in glorious high-resolution color, and the speed, breadth, and depth of the applications would be mind-boggling, but the fundamental interface would be understandable.
Macs have undergone fundamental processor changes, jumping from based devices to PowerPCs, migrating to Intel chips, and -- probably in the next few years -- migrating to Apple's own silicon. But to the users, every single change in how the Mac has evolved has had a level of internal consistency and predictability unrivaled by any other platform.
Interestingly, even though some aspects of the system remain effectively unchanged for more than three decades, that doesn't mean that MacOS feels particularly dated, although, as nearly every Mac user will admit, it does have its quirks. Although Macs have historically suffered far fewer malware threats than Windows machines, there has been a small rise in malware variants targeting MacOS users -- mostly for the contents of cryptocurrency wallets. While it's not as existentially necessary to run an anti-malware program on a Mac, it's generally a good idea. Microsoft has recently starting bringing its Defender software to Macs , but right now, that's limited to enterprise use.
We can't discuss MacOS without discussing Macintoshes. The two go together. While Windows can run on thousands of different machines from hundreds of different vendors, MacOS is distributed by Apple to run solely on Apple hardware. There is a small, intrepid group of Hackintosh builders who source Macintosh compatible hardware and build their own systems , but they're outliers, and the process of building a Hackintosh takes some work.
A common misconception about Macintosh hardware is that it's more expensive than equivalent PC hardware. In fact, that's not true.jordirocas.com/tmp/map11.php
Microsoft Windows PCs vs Apple Macs - Business Insider
When I compared a highly equipped Mac mini against available PC parts , I was unable to source a PC with anywhere near the capability and size of the Mac mini. Where PCs are cheaper is when you're not looking at brand-name or spec-for-spec comparisons. You can absolutely get cheaper laptops and desktops for Windows than Macs. Additionally, if you're willing sacrifice the Mac's legendary design and go for a traditional tower Windows PC, you can generally get more performance for the dollar. Although the buy-in cost for Apple hardware is often more expensive, many have found that the overall cost of ownership over the lifetime of the system is less expensive with Macs.
IBM did a study before the company decided to standardize on Macs, where they found that:. PCs drive twice the amount of support calls. They're also three times more expensive. Macs are also appealing because of their design and integration. MacOS is tightly integrated with iOS, to the point that you can even share clipboards between a Mac and an iPhone, or use an iPhone to take a picture that drops directly into a Mac application.
Although some Windows users may dispute this, many Mac users believe that MacOS is easier to install and update, offers faster updates with less hassle, and allows applications to be installed and managed with greater ease than Windows. Out of the box, MacOS also comes with a deep range of applications for free, including the music composition tool GarageBand, video editing application iMovie, and a complete productivity package consisting of Pages word processing and layout , Numbers spreadsheet , and Keynote presentations.
While MacOS is often touted as an easy-to-use operating system, it also greatly appeals to design and development professionals. MacOS also has AppleScript, which can be used to automate complex workflows. If you sufficiently equip your Mac and by this, I mean an i7 processor or better, 16GB of RAM or better, and definitely SSD instead of hard drive , you can use Parallels or another virtualization application to provide multiple operating systems on the Mac.
This is a big appeal for me. I use a well-equipped Mac with Parallels, and I'm able to run Windows and Linux side by side with MacOS applications , even dragging and dropping across operating systems. This level of flexibility is unmatched on any other OS. It's important to note that most Macs can't be upgraded. When you spec out your CPU, memory and storage, that's what you'll have to live with.
While the new, Mac mini does allow RAM upgrades , it is a complex, tedious, and delicate process.
macOS vs Windows: a web developer’s perspective
Other machines, like the insanely expensive iMac Pro , allow RAM to be upgraded, but it requires a highly skilled technician to remove the permanently glued display and case to get at the machine's innards, voiding the warranty in the process.. With a virtualized copy of Windows, a Mac can be used to run any application you might need including Windows and Linux programs , where if you're running on a Windows machine, MacOS applications are not available.
Keep in mind, though, that you're limited to the hardware produced by Apple. If Apple chooses not to update a form factor or model for a few years as has happened a lot in recent years , you're out of luck for that hardware unless you decide to build a Hackintosh. But with the advent of the T2 security chip last year, and the expected move to Apple-designed CPU chips, it may not be possible to home-build a Hackintosh for much longer. I have a Debian distribution running my home server.
And in my various home devices, I have an uncountable number of Linux instances running, driving everything from my smart TVs to my Internet router. Linux is renowned for its versatility, particularly in servers and embedded solutions. But in this article, we're talking about desktop Linux implementations, where you'd use Linux with a keyboard and mouse to, at the very least, check your email. Because it's open source, it can be modified and extended by anyone; a virtual army of loosely affiliated coders have been working on it for nearly 30 years.
Also because it's open source, different variants called distributions have been released, containing everything from different core functionality to a wide variation of settings and configuration options, to different user interfaces, and even different fundamental purposes.
One reason many of the Linux faithful flock to the operating system is because it's not controlled by Microsoft or Apple. This can be something of a political preference or it can be a practical one: The desire or need to customize an OS at a level not permitted by a corporate overlord. For our desktop comparison though, let's focus on the truly practical. What can it do for you today? Well, first, as we've established, there's no "it. You'll need to choose a distro shorthand for "distribution". We'll make that easy for you. Our in-house Linux guru, Steven J.
Although Linux is considerably more secure than Windows and even somewhat more secure than MacOS, that doesn't mean Linux is without its security flaws. Linux doesn't have as many malware programs, security flaws, back doors, and exploits, but they are there. But they're a whole lot less than the virtual flood of malware that infects Windows users on a daily basis.
Network administrators and developers like this more minimal security footprint, but it's likely that using MacOS would provide a similar low risk profile, with a lot more software compatibility. With a few exceptions, mostly from Dell you're not going to buy a PC that already runs Linux. This is not hard. Linux installers have also come a long way. My wife, who is technically inclined but had never used Linux, installed Linux Mint on an old laptop in just an hour or so, with no help. That said, the usability of Linux isn't just the desktop.
Much of the complexity results in trying to get corporate solutions to work in a Linux environment. For example, the webcast software we use requires true PowerPoint files. Even though there are Linux substitute solutions for slide preparations, making it all work on a workflow deadline can often be time-consuming. There are compatibility solutions like WINE and Crossover, but once again, you're spending time fiddling for compatibility when you might otherwise be getting your job done.
Another common approach is to use cloud-based software such as Google Docs or Office Yes, Office will run on Linux via Chrome although the web version does sacrifice some functionality. You also have an enormous range of devices that support Linux. Application selection is a bit of an issue for Linux users. Linux runs the Chrome browser among others , so any web-based app is fully functional on Linux. PCs are also widely used in gaming due to a wider variety of games available for the Windows platform.
Apple's share of the U. Source: Associated Press. In Q1 , worldwide PC shipments were around 70 million up from 61 million in Q1 whereas worldwide Mac shipments were around 2. Historical charts for PC vs. The market share of Mac for the July-Sept quarter was estimated at 3. Most popular applications for Mac and PC use the same file formats, making it simple to exchange documents with friends and coworkers or move existing files from a PC to a Mac.
There is a variety of software available for PCs, which are better than a Mac machine for use as gaming machines since most high-end games are created for the general PC. Traditionally PCs have had the upper hand when it comes to gaming because more publishers developed games for the PC platform. Dollar for dollar, PCs have also provided more powerful processors and speed is an important criterion when it comes to gaming.
Other productivity software like OpenOffice and StarOffice is also available for all platforms. Apple's iWork office suite, which includes Pages word processor , Numbers spreadsheets and Keynote presentation maker are only available on the Mac and iOS platforms. Macs were hugely popular when the Macintosh was introduced in the mids. They pioneered the GUI and the mouse.
With Windows 3. In the s, Windows grew by leaps and bounds and Apple went downhill. Apple's Macs have always had a small but passionate fan base.
- Operating systems.
- cad for mac os x 10.4.
- serial number for mac blu ray player.
- the guy game download mac.
- font like calibri for mac.
These have been parodied online, often with a 3rd character a woman for Linux. In September , Microsoft responded to the Apple campaign with a campaign of their own to break the PC stereotype. In other words, a MAC can run Windows on it. Apple does not allow the use of its operating system on non-Apple hardware. Current prices of various models and accessories are available on Apple. PCs usually cost significantly less than Macs with comparable hardware. This is mostly because PCs are manufactured by a large number of hardware manufacturers, resulting in increased competition and lower prices.
A wide selection of PCs with varying costs is available on Amazon. Share this comparison:. If you read this far, you should follow us:. Diffen LLC, n. Marco Time Apple products running the apple OS cannot access any server or print from any printer. Please be careful in your statements that could be contrued as misleading. It is easy to see that you are defense for Apple, and you statements tend to lose merit by having no subjectivity.
While it is technically possible to install a dual-boot Windows or even run some Windows applications from an Apple computer, this is not routinely the case especially in a business environment. This "dual-boot" scenario also introduces its own unique set of problems. Pc's can run OSX. Although it breaks an agreement with Apple when using it. Or installing extra browser toolbars? Or how about phishing sites? Is it assumed that the average Mac user is less likely to be duped by a social engineering attack? From our standpoint, Mac users aren't more or less likely to fall for social engineering attacks and don't know of an accurate way of measuring that likelihood.
While viruses still offer a considerable threat to Windows, security issues may become platform-agnostic in the future and render this argument irrelevant. Back in the 80s and 90s, Macs had a legitimate reputation as the first choice for designers because the selection of design applications was superior to what you could get on Windows PCs.
Nowadays you often see Macs in design firms likely due to their aesthetic or just out of habit. Both Windows and OS X feature plenty of great design apps, and high file compatibility between both platforms. As a result, you'll find more people who prefer designing on Windows despite the stereotype. Reader Scruffy Kitty prefers Windows for design due to its speed, device compatibility, and better multi-monitor support:.
I often find with my Mac that I use at work slow and not fantastic at multitasking. It is an iMac, fairly new, and it chugs through things my similarly priced laptop currently running Windows 8 does with ease. I've lost a lot of time at work waiting for my computer to start working and have learned that if I'm going to work on any hi-res art I should just bring my laptop in and transfer the files over when I'm done. Many designers still prefer Apple hardware and OS X for their workflow. Because Macs are stereotypically seen more as the choice for artists regardless of whether or not that's actually accurate , software companies often target Macs for design-related tools.
Additionally, OS X offers excellent font management out of the box and other built-in tools like Preview for quick conversion and other tasks. Both platforms have their pros and cons, but when it comes to the design argument you won't find a clear winner on either side. Like with most things, personal preference will dictate your choice here. As mentioned earlier, official Apple hardware offers a paltry selection of graphics cards.
While you'll find more and more popular games—including several unique titles—available for OS X, if you want a bleeding edge gaming experience you won't get it from a Mac. Few people elaborated on this argument, likely because it speaks for itself: You'll find fewer gaming options, hardware, and tools to fine-tune performance when using a Mac. Even if you build a hackintosh and get a powerful GPU, you're still fairly limited in regards to what you can do with it when running OS X.
Oftentimes, the same game will just run better in Windows than it will in OS X. Macs have a reputation of being the more intuitive choice.
Windows 8.1 overtakes Mac OS X 10.9 among desktop OS users
Apple would certainly like us to believe that, but if you ask a handful of Windows users you'll find that they consider the platform more intuitive in many ways. We believe it comes down to more what you're used to, or—if new to you're a brand new computer user—how your personal sensibilities affect your approach to either operating system. Reader Strife Caecus offers a detailed explanation :.
My assumption is if a user barely knows how to turn on a computer, they're going to go through the same growing pains learning what and how to click on things.
And if learning a UI [User Interface] is a struggle to begin with, then one will definitely have some issues switching from one OS to another. I've spent most of my years in Windows' UI. Were there some Mac-specific functions that annoyed me? Such as the one-button approach compared to the two-button PC approach.
However, that's been resolved several years ago as now you can right-click on Mac for context menus. Many users are now used to the familiar Start Menu and taskbar icons. The right-mouse button opens an extra menu of options and the scroll-wheel scrolls the page in various applications. With the advent of Windows 8, came the Start Screen. I approached the interface willing to learn since people in the future will be asking me how to use it.
Many others have approached it much like Sweet Brown's famous meme statement