Apple mac mini news 2014
Lightning ports weren't as relevant in , and headphone jacks apparently aren't now, so an update to ports is much needed.
Mac Mini 5 things business pros need - TechRepublic
However, the new model may have updated Thunderbolt ports and USB-C ports, but will likely drop the 3. It does have a built-in speaker, but might feature an audio out port to connect higher quality audio gear. Not only do consumers want more connectivity with ports, but also with wireless networking. But I don't know if they thought through that. To better serve professionals, the new Mac Mini will need to support a host of wireless standards including ac Wi-Fi, ax Wi-Fi, and more.
While people love the portability and flexibility of the Mac Mini's size, they are on their own when it comes to obtaining a monitor, mouse, and keyboard. A bundle would still have a lower price tag than a MacBook, and would give Mac Mini fans all the components they need to successfully use the device. Whether you need iPhone and Mac tips or rundowns of enterprise-specific Apple news, we've got you covered.
Delivered Tuesdays. Macy Bayern has nothing to disclose. She does not hold investments in the technology companies she covers. What business pros want from Apple's new MacBooks, iMacs, and Mac Pros It's not too late for Apple to win back enterprise Mac users who are switching to Windows machines or low-cost Chromebooks, but it's close. Apple Weekly Newsletter Whether you need iPhone and Mac tips or rundowns of enterprise-specific Apple news, we've got you covered.
Delivered Tuesdays Sign up today Sign up today. Editor's Picks. Python is eating the world: How one developer's side project became the hottest programming language on the planet. How iRobot used data science, cloud, and DevOps to design its next-gen smart home robots. Beyond the PC: Lenovo's ambitious plan for the future of computing. Straight up: How the Kentucky bourbon industry is going high tech. Show Comments. I use all my machines for light writing, web browsing, keeping up with social networks, and email.
But I use my main machine for seven main workloads:. This is what finally killed my iMac. It does one 4K stream reasonably well, but just choked with four camera feeds. I need PowerPoint, Photoshop, Illustrator, and other apps open, along with a bunch of research resources.
Big analysis documents: When I'm working on a big analysis, I often need a bunch of documents open. I used to have four screens on my iMac and even that wasn't quite enough screen real estate to see everything. Coding: I support a number of open source projects, one of which manages donations for more than 10 thousand non-profits. VM simulations: I used to do network simulations of up to 16 simultaneously-running VMs. I'm not doing quite as much work with this now, so I usually don't need more than four VMs open at once. Fortunately, running Parallels, I can cut and paste between both environments, which saves a ton of time.
With a lot of my bigger projects, I've been craving a wider screen. When the ultrawide monitors started appearing a few years ago , I was bummed to discover that my iMac wouldn't support them. Then, when I started doing multicam video either with four talking heads or lots of camera angles shot simultaneously it became clear the iMac had met its match. For me, the best fit was a Mac rather than a Windows machine. The Mac would run Windows, and since I need to run applications on both, I couldn't just run out and buy or build any old Windows machine. That put me in wait-and-see mode for new Macs.
As I discussed a few weeks ago, there were four scenarios for a new machine to meet my workload. A Hackintosh could have done it, but I just didn't want to go that route if I could help it. While I'm not uncomfortable with the technical hacks to set one up, I am uncomfortable with the ongoing fiddling required for maintaining them, especially during upgrades. When I have an assignment to work on, it's sometimes very time-sensitive and I need a machine I can rely on. Since I wanted an ultrawide monitor, the screens that come with an iMac or a MacBook Pro would have been more pain than gain.
The MacBook Pro screen is too small for desktop use, and the iMac screen is unwieldy and heavy for most standard monitor stands. I really wanted a headless computer, and since the Mac Pro is missing in action, that meant a Mac Mini -- if Apple ever upgraded it. That's just silly. To be honest, I would have liked an even higher performing processor, but this will still be a huge boost. Early Geekbench scores put the Mac Mini at for single core and for multi-core. In terms of single-core performance, that puts the Mac Mini at just below the 4.
In single-core performance, that's about 25 percent faster than my old iMac. Also: Here's why Apple doesn't really care about the Mac or iPad. In multicore performance, it still lags a bit behind the old Mac Pro 8-core Xeon processor, but not by much. Beyond the two hugely expensive pro machines, the new Mac Mini with the processor I chose appears to be faster in multicore performance than all the other Macs.
In single core performance, only one machine bests it.
Apple Updates Mac mini
Next up is memory. I haven't pushed past about 24GB in any of my recent workloads. So, given a choice, I'd rather not spend on 64GB.
- Mac mini 2018 vs Mac mini 2014?
- Hands On: Apple Finally Updates the Mac Mini.
- mov mpg converter free mac!
- netflix silverlight error n8010 mac.
- best free sheet music software for mac?
- Six months with Apple's 2018 Mac Mini: Everything I love and hate about it.
- how to import raw files from camera to mac.
My preference is usually to buy gear when my workload needs it. While we don't consider the memory directly end-user accessible, service providers can access the internals of the Mac Mini to upgrade the memory. I'm honestly not entirely sure what I'll encounter when the Mac arrives, but I'm sure it'll be interesting. Next is storage. Apple charges way too much on storage, but it's not internally upgradeable. Apple's internal storage is also seriously fast, since it relies on flash memory.
Here, I needed to balance performance against price.
I use an external direct-attached RAID array for my video production and assets, so I don't need a huge amount of on-system storage. I also have a very large NAS with most of my other resources. I checked my various machines and, as might be expected, the main workhorse iMac used the most. Even so, it was under GB.
That machine was equipped with 1TB and I found that quite workable. Finally, there was another big decision. This time, though, it was not about price, but about reliability. I am not running 10Gb Ethernet here, mostly because none of my computers support it. I spent the extra hundred bucks and configured the Mac Mini with 10Gb.
- third party xbox 360 controller mac?
- java virtual machine on mac;
- microsoft firewall client for isa server mac.
- Battle of the titchy.
- whitney bond buffalo mac and cheese;
- indesign cc crack para mac.
- Best Desktops for 12222.
My only concern is that since Apple only has such a port on the iMac Pro and now the Mac Mini, will it work properly? Apple just doesn't have that much experience with this new port. I decided to go for it anyway, because it'll help future-proof the machine. Also, worst case, since the machine has four Thunderbolt 3 ports, the worst case scenario is to throw an Ethernet adapter on the Thunderbolt and use it that way. I asked for Thunderbolt and USB-3 and got it.
The Straits Times
I asked for a 10Gb Ethernet port and I got it. I even suggested Space Gray and got it, although I don't really care about shade of gray. I paid a buck less. It's rare okay, never before that Apple builds a machine that's pretty much exactly what I specified as what I need.
So, yeah, I bought one. You might notice I did not discuss an external GPU. To be honest, I don't know if I'll need one. If I do, that's another thousand bucks. I won't enjoy spending it, but at least it's incremental. Just probably not this year. Finally, let's look at the other Apple machines I discussed in my pre-game scenario. Yes, I would have gotten a Retina display, but I don't want that form factor screen.